Thanks for this! It’s nice to see the relevant organs are reading Choosing Victory… Usually I take being quoted as cause for concern. But in this case I think it’s notable they were willing to look past all the accusatory language in the article and still latch onto the three concrete modes of cooperation I mentioned. A lot can happen in four days, but at this point I expect both sides will agree to some AI dialogue mechanism as a key deliverable from the Trump-Xi summit.
In case you didn’t see it already, your article was cited by 科技日报: https://www.stdaily.com/web/gdxw/2026-05/08/content_513663.html
Thanks for this! It’s nice to see the relevant organs are reading Choosing Victory… Usually I take being quoted as cause for concern. But in this case I think it’s notable they were willing to look past all the accusatory language in the article and still latch onto the three concrete modes of cooperation I mentioned. A lot can happen in four days, but at this point I expect both sides will agree to some AI dialogue mechanism as a key deliverable from the Trump-Xi summit.
Even as it began requiring developers to censor politically inconvenient content under regulations like TC260??
Seriously? Can you share an example of politically inconvenient content? Or do mean ‘lies’?